https://bit.ly/3Nstx2B https://bit.ly/3Nwempq https://bit.ly/3T0sTKZ https://bit.ly/3DQVY7m https://bit.ly/3STkn09 https://bit.ly/3STkKrz https://bit.ly/3zybPFe https://bit.ly/3zBUjzM https://craigs.opdirectory.com https://craigs.linktotaal.nl https://craigs.slimmestart.nl https://craigs.rtlplaza.nl https://craigs.vakantie-links.nl https://craigs.startje.com https://craigs.beginspot.nl https://craigs.sitepark.nl Susan Walsh Reply: June 25th, 2010 at 5:57 pm Passer_By, that soothes my worried and slightly padded soul…. [Reply] Aldonza Reply: June 26th, 2010 at 12:39 pm I’ll take a few extra pounds of muscle over both options. [Reply] » Reply to this Comment « Lisette says: June 24, 2010 at 10:04 pm As you noted in your exchange with GudEnuf, above, I think one of feminism’s big problems today is that no one is really clear on what it means anymore. I think I’m far more sympathetic to feminism than you are, Susan, but I’m not sure we’re that far apart on some of the issues you’ve discussed here. For example, I agree that the under-representation of women in corporate boardrooms is more likely a reflection of individual women’s choices than of institutionalized sexism (though I believe sexism – against women – is alive and well). And I don’t think I would fit in very well with the sex-positive feminists, either. So maybe modern feminists wouldn’t accept me as one of them, but I would never call myself an anti-feminist, either. I think feminism has become a very muddled concept in the 21st century. We’ve achieved equal educational and, arguably, professional opportunity for women – so where do we go from there? Or have we reached a point where we would need to acknowledge that individual women are all too different to expect us to make sacrifices in the name of the “sisterhood”? [Reply] Susan Walsh Reply: June 25th, 2010 at 12:44 am