sdgsdgsg - PukiWiki

[ トップ ] [ 編集 | 凍結 | 差分 | バックアップ | 添付 | リロード ] [ 新規 | 一覧 | 単語検索 | 最終更新 | ヘルプ ]

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

i i i i i i i i

i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

Blacklisted offshore countries and alternative solutions

Today's international business leaders register IBCs mainly because this legal structure provides a way to run a business on a global scale while legally avoiding wealth taxes and excessive paperwork - in addition to offshore bank accounts or buying non-reportable assets like offshore gold and overseas Real estate or productive, productive farmland in politically and economically less influential countries using cryptocurrencies. Some believe that low tax rates are the wave of the future.

At the same time, the jurisdictions that offer business owners such opportunities are often referred to as tax havens or offshores. Offshore jurisdictions are often blacklisted as IBC beneficiaries are typically prohibited from doing local business - meaning they are not legally able in the country where their business is based To do business. IBC owners can use transfer pricing to improve intellectual property and sales for very low tax rates; however, this can have certain ramifications as their home country is likely to require them to report their involvement in offshore business. Offshore jurisdictions can aim to make a profit by allowing business owners to hide their names while facilitating illegal and harmful business dealings, including warfare, drug trafficking, and other harmful activities.

Depending on the legal system, the owners of offshore companies may take advantage of the opportunity to obey laws that are more customer- or business-friendly than creditor-friendly. Some countries offer protection from all claims unless the transfer is deemed fraudulent. There are several types of offshore companies called shell companies and shelf companies that are intentionally set up to conduct illegal activities. The former only exist on paper, produce nothing, and facilitate tax avoidance while disguising the identity of fraudsters. The latter are fully established entities with no activity created to bypass the registration process while entering into quick trade deals with established companies.

There are currently thirty countries on the EU offshore blacklist drawn up by the European Commission. It includes countries such as Anguilla, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, Belize, Barbados, Bermuda, Brunei, the British Virgin Islands, the Cook Islands, the Cayman Islands, Grenada, Guernsey, Hong Kong, Liechtenstein, Liberia, the Maldives, the Marshall Islands, Mauritius , Montserrat, Monaco, Nauru, Niue, Panama, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, St. Kitts and Nevis, the Seychelles, the US Virgin Islands, the Turks and Caicos Islands and Vanuatu.

The consequences of blacklisting or accepting payments from a company in offshore areas can be quite severe as those involved unwittingly initiate or support hostile and questionable activities such as terrorism, warfare and the search for weapons of mass destruction (nuclear programs) could. , and partner with socially and politically dangerous terrorist organizations, human traffickers and drug cartels. Involvement in such activities can lead to increased corruption in addition to legal proceedings, sanctions and a criminal record after carrying out due diligence reviews.

There are also some countries that are graylisted as insufficiently cooperative because they only partially meet the regulations and standards of information transparency of the European Union (EU) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and obey corporate tax laws too harmonize and align the tax systems in the EU member states.

Such jurisdictions support greater transparency by increasing social security and committing to the internationally agreed tax standard, but have not significantly implemented this standard. They are considered alternatives to blacklisted offshores that have neither committed themselves to the internationally agreed tax standard nor taken steps towards cooperation with the OECD.

http://www.confiduss.com/en/services/incorporation/location/tax-haven/

Last-modified: 2021-11-02 (火) 19:05:13 (904d)